bibliography+-+External+Stakeholders

(back to External Stakeholders)
=Required Readings= =Supplementary Readings=
 * 1) Bernays, Edward L. (1947) “The Engineering of Consent.” //Annals of the American Academy of//
 * 2) // Political and Social Science //, Vol. 250, Communication and Social Action pp. 113-120.
 * 3) Moran, Theodore 1973. "Transnational Strategies of Protection and Defense by Multinational Corporations: Spreading the Risk and Raising the Cost for Nationalization in Natural Resources," //International Organization// **27**(2):273-287.
 * 4) Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games.” //International Organization// **42**:427-460.
 * 5) *Rowley, Timothy J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. //Academy of Management Review//, 22(4), 887-910.
 * 6) McAdam, Doug (2009). “Social Movements and the Growth in Opposition to Global Projects.”
 * 7) Sebenius, James K. 1992 “Negotiations Analysis: A Characterization and Review” //Management Science// **38**(1):18-38.
 * 8) Henisz, Witold J (2009). “Preferences, Structure, Influence: The Engineering of Consent.”

The Socio-Political Challenge Faced by (Multinational) Investors and the Limitations of a Purely Market-based Strategy

 * 1) Vernon, Raymond. 1977. “Storm Over the Multinationals: Problems and Prospects”, //Foreign Affairs//, 55(3):243-262.
 * 2) Kobrin, S. J. 1987. Testing the Bargaining Hypothesis in the Manufacturing Sector in Developing Countries. //International Organization//, 41(1): 609-638.
 * 3) *Woodhouse, Erik J. 2006. “The Obsolescing Bargain Redux? Foreign Investment in the Electric Power Sector in Developing Countries” //International Law and Politics// 38:121-219.
 * 4) *Orr, R. and Scott, W.R. "Institutional Exceptions on Global Projects: A Process Model", Journal of International Business Studies, 2008
 * 5) Zelner, Bennet, Witold Henisz and Guy Holburn. 2009. “Contested Implementation and Retrenchment of Neoliberal Refrms: The Case of the Global Private Power Industry, 1989-2001”
 * 6) Henisz, Witold J., Levitt Raymond E. and Dan Settel 2009. “Socio-Political Governance Mechanisms”
 * 1) Henisz, Witold J., Levitt Raymond E. and Dan Settel 2009. “Socio-Political Governance Mechanisms”

Lessons and Insights from Economic Development and Economic History

 * 1) North, D. C. (1991) "Institutions." //Journal of Economic Perspectives//, 5: 97-112.
 * 2) Black, Bernard, Reinier Kraakman and Anna Tarassova 2000. “Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?” //Stanford Law Review// **52**(6): 1731-1808.
 * 3) Rajan, Raghuram G. and Luigi Zingales 2003. “The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century” //Journal of Financial Economics// **69**(1):5-50.
 * 4) Kogut, Bruce & Andrew Spicer. 2004. //Critical and Alternative Perspectives on International Assistance to Post-Communist Countries: A Review and an Analysis//: World Bank.
 * 5) Ellerman, David. 2005. //Helping People Help Themselves//. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press) pp. 1-24 & 240-253.
 * 6) Root, Hilton. 2006. //Capital and Collusion: The Political Logic of Global Economic Development// pp. 1-56 & 221-245

Tools and Insights from Political Economy

 * 1) Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 2002. // Predicting Politics // (Columbus: Ohio State University Press)
 * 2) Walker, Jack L. Jr. 1991. //Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions and Social Movements// (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press)
 * 3) Jones, Bryan D. and Frank R. Baumgartner 2005. //The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems// (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)

Tools and Insights from Sociology

 * 1) Georg Simmel, "Triad,” in Kurt H. Wolff (Ed. and Trans.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 145-169). New York: Free Press. (Originalwork published in 1908).
 * 2) Knoke, D. (1990). Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
 * 3) Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink 1999. “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.” //International Social Science Journal// **51**(159):89-101.

Tools and Insights from Strategic Communications and Negotiations

 * 1) Watkins, Michael T. 2001 “Principles of Persuasion” //Negotiation Journal// **17**(2):115-137.
 * 2) Elsbach, Kimberly D. 2006. //Organizational Perception Management// (Mahwah NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
 * 3) //The Debate Regarding the Financial Case for and Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility and External Stakeholder Engagement//
 * 4) Baron, David. 2001. “Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy,” // Journal of Economics & Management Strategy // 10(1): 7-45.
 * 5) Vogel, David. 2006. //The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility//. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. (Chapter 1).
 * 6) Elkington, John, Emerson, Jed and Below, Seb. (2006) “The Value Palette: A Tool for Full Spectrum Strategy” //California Management Review// 48(2): 6-28.

Skim/Review Stakeholder Engagement Manuals & Materials
Anglo American: [|http://www.angloamerican.co.uk/aa/development/society/engagement/seat] International Finance Corporation: [] UNEP/Accountability: []