Bibliography+-+Innovate

Key Readings
The *readings are considered foundational papers that develop the theory. The other key readings provide the background and empirical regularities for the topic. 
 * 1) Acs, Z. and D. Audretsch, 1988, Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis, American Economic Review, 78, 4, p.678-690.
 * 2) *R. Gilbert, 2006, “Innovation and Competition,” Journal of Industrial Organization Education, V1, Article 8.
 * 3) Jaffe, A. 1986, Technological Opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firm’s patent, profits and market value, American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001.
 * 4) *d’Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin, 1988, Co-operative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers, American Economic Review, 78, 1133-1137.
 * 5) Teece, David, J., 1986, “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,” Research Policy, 15: 285-305.
 * 6) *Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, 1995, Complementarities and fit: Strategy, Structure and Organizational Change in Manufacturing, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, p. 179-208.
 * 7) Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. 2006 “In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science.
 * 8) Saxenian, A., 1994, “Inside Out: Blurring Firms’ Boundaries,” Chapter 6 of Regional Advantage.
 * 9) *Aghion, P. and J. Tirole, 1994, “On the Management of Innovation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 1185-1207.
 * 10) Lerner, J., and R. Merges, 1997, The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology Industry, Journal of Industrial Economics.
 * 11) Cohen, W. and R. Levin, 1989, Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure, Handbook of Industrial Organization.
 * 12) *Vives, X., 2008, “Innovation and Competitive Pressure, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(3), 419-469.

The Basics

 * 1) Arrow, 1962, "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,"in Richard R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press: pp. 609-619.
 * 2) Gilbert, R. and D. Newbery, 1982. “Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly,” American Economic Review, 72(3), p.514-526.
 * 3)  Reinganum, J. 1983. “Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly,” // American Economic Review //, 73, p. 741-748.
 * 4) Christensen, C. 1997. "How can great firms fail? Insights from the hard disk industry." Chapter 1 in //The Innovator's Dilemma//, Harvard Business School Press, p.3-28.
 * 5) Henderson, R.M. and K. Clark, 1990. “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, p. 9-30.
 * 6) Cohen, W. “Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance,” in Stoneman, ed., Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and of Technological Change, p. 182-198.
 * 7) Griliches, Z., 1998, R&D and Productivity, Chicago University Press.
 * 8) Hall, B., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations,” Rand Journal of Economics, 36, p.16-38.
 * 9) Mowery and Rosenberg, 1982, “The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies,” in Rosenberg, ed., Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, p. 193-195, 225-238.
 * 10) Nelson, 1959, “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research,” Journal of Political Economy, 67: 297-306.
 * 11) Schmookler, 1962, “Economic Sources of Inventive Activity,” Journal of Economic History, 22: p.1-20.

Appropriability and Spillovers

 * 1) De Bondt, R., 1997. “Spillovers and innovative activities.” International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 15(1), p.1-28.
 * 2) Griliches, Z. 1992. “The Search for R&D Spillovers,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, p. S29-47.
 * 3) Geroski, P., 1996, “Do Spillovers undermine the incentives to innovate?,” in S. Dowrick, Economic Approaches to Innovation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot., p.76-97.
 * 4) Levin, R., Klevorich, A., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1987. “Appropriating returns from industrial research and development” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: p.783-820.
 * 5) Cohen, W., R. Nelson and J. Walsh. 2002. “Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D.” Management Science, 48(1), p.1-23.

Complementarity of (Innovation) Activities and Assets

 * 1) Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., 1989, “Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D--implications for the analysis of R&D investment”, Economic Journal, 99. p.569-596.
 * 2) Arora, A. and A. Gambardella, 1990. ”Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 38, p.361-379.
 * 3) Arora, A. and A. Gambardella, 1994, “Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability and external linkages in biotechnology,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, p.91-114.
 * 4) Cockburn, I. and R. Henderson, 1998. “Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior and the organization of research in drug discovery,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, p. 157-182
 * 5) Athey, S. and S. Stern, 1998. “An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories about Complementarity in Organizational Design,” NBER working paper #6600.
 * 6) Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. and G. Prennushi, 1997. “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines,” American Economic Review, 87, p.291-213.
 * 7) Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, 1990. “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization,” American Economic Review, 80, p.511-528.
 * 8) Ghemawat, P and G. Pisano, 1999. “Building and Sustaining Success,” in Strategy and the Business Landscape, Chapter 5, Addison-Wesley: Massachusetts.

Organization and Innovation

 * 1) Anton, J. and D. Yao, 1995. “Start-ups, Spin-offs and Internal Projects,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11, p.362-378.
 * 2) Cassiman B. and M. Ueda, 2006. “Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-ups,” Management Science, 52 (2), p. 262 -275.
 * 3) Gans J.S. and S. Stern, 2000. “Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative Destruction,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(4), p.485-511.
 * 4) Gans J.S. and S. Stern, 2003. “The Product Market and the “Market for Ideas”: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs,” Research Policy, 32 (2), p.333-350.

Market Structure and Competition

 * 1) Aghion, P., R. Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt and S. Prantl, 2009. “The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1): 20–32.
 * 2) Cassiman, B., Colombo, M., Gerrone, P. and R. Veugelers, 2005. “The Impact of M&A on the R&D Process. An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Technological and Market Relatedness,” Research Policy, 34(2), p. 195-220.
 * 3) Dasgupta & Stiglitz, 1980. “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity,” Economic Journal, 90, p.266-293.
 * 4) Kamien, M. and N. Schwartz, 1982. Market Structure and Innovation.